Task 1 — Compulsory Essay. You read input material presenting a topic and two specific discussion points. Write an essay of 220–260 words examining both points and making a final judgement about which is more significant or effective. This is a discursive analytical essay — you must take a clear final position. Register: formal academic.
Introduction Body 1 (Factor 1) Body 2 (Factor 2) Conclusion
Paragraph 1 — Introduction
Step Option A — Direct approach Option B — Analytical approach
1 · Hook It is often asserted that [Topic] is the most pressing challenge of our era. In recent years, [Topic] has become a matter of intense public debate.
2 · Outline This essay will examine two possible strategies governments could employ: [Point 1] and [Point 2]. This essay will evaluate the merits of both [Point 1] and [Point 2] as potential solutions.
3 · Roadmap …before determining which approach is more effective. …with a view to deciding which is the more fundamental factor.
1
The Hook
Introduce the general topic with a formal, engaging opening sentence.
It is widely acknowledged that [Topic] presents both significant opportunities and complex challenges.
Few issues have generated as much debate in recent years as [Topic].
The question of how best to address [Topic] has become increasingly urgent.
2
The Outline
Name both points that the essay will examine.
This essay will explore two of the most significant factors relating to [Topic]: [Point 1] and [Point 2].
Two key considerations will be examined: [Point 1], and the role of [Point 2].
3
The Roadmap
Signal that a final judgement will be made.
…and determine which is the more effective and sustainable approach.
…before reaching a considered conclusion as to which carries greater weight.
Worked Example — Introduction

It is often asserted that protecting the environment is the most pressing challenge of our era. This essay will examine two possible strategies governments could employ to foster eco-friendly behaviour: education and the implementation of stricter laws and fines, before determining which approach is more effective.

Paragraph 2 — Body Paragraph 1: First Factor
Step Option A — Direct approach Option B — Analytical approach
1 · Opening Primary consideration must be given to the role of [Point 1]. To begin with, it is widely argued that [Point 1] is a key driver of change.
2 · Reasoning A compelling argument in favor of this method is that it fosters a long-term shift in mindset. By [action], the state ensures that [group] views [issue] as a core value rather than a chore. From a [social/pedagogical/economic] standpoint, this approach addresses the root cause of the issue.
3 · Result This in turn leads to a situation where [Result] becomes second nature to the citizenry. Consequently, this ensures that [X] is viewed as a core value rather than a chore.
1
Opening
Introduce the first point clearly with appropriate academic language.
A compelling argument in favour of [Point 1] is that it [benefit/outcome].
[Point 1] deserves particular attention as a potential solution, given that [reason].
2
Reasoning
Explain how and why this point works. Move beyond simple description into analysis.
This in turn creates a situation where [positive consequence] becomes the default rather than the exception.
The strength of this approach lies in its ability to [key advantage].
This is particularly significant because [contextual reason or wider effect].
3
Result
State the concrete outcome or consequence of this approach.
As a result, [positive outcome], which in turn [wider beneficial effect].
The long-term effect of this is [outcome], a development which cannot be underestimated.
Worked Example — Body Paragraph 1

Primary consideration must be given to the role of education. A compelling argument in favour of this method is that it fosters a long-term shift in mindset. By integrating environmental studies into the school curriculum, the state ensures that the next generation views sustainability as a core value rather than a chore. This in turn leads to a situation where eco-conscious decisions become second nature to the citizenry.

Paragraph 3 — Body Paragraph 2: Second Factor
Step Option A — Direct approach Option B — Analytical approach
1 · Transition Turning to the question of [Point 2], it is widely acknowledged that [key claim]. On the other hand, the role of [Point 2] cannot be overlooked.
2 · Contrast While [Point 1] is a slow process, [Point 2] can effect change almost overnight. Unlike the voluntary nature of [Point 1], [Point 2] provides an immediate deterrent.
3 · Big Picture Furthermore, the implications of [Point 2] cannot be overlooked, as they hold [Target Group] accountable in a way that [Point 1] simply cannot. This strategy provides a necessary framework that [Point 1] simply cannot offer.
1
Transition
Signal the shift to the second point. Compare or contrast with the first.
In stark contrast to [Point 1], [Point 2] offers a fundamentally different approach.
Shifting focus to [Point 2], it becomes clear that [key observation].
2
Contrast
Show how Point 2 differs from or complements Point 1. Demonstrate analytical thinking.
Whereas [Point 1] operates over the long term, [Point 2] is capable of producing measurable results in a far shorter timeframe.
What distinguishes [Point 2] is its capacity to [key differentiating quality].
3
Big Picture
Explain the wider significance or implications of Point 2.
The implications of this cannot be understated: [Point 2] addresses [Issue] at a systemic level, rather than merely treating its symptoms.
Furthermore, [Point 2] has the capacity to effect structural change, which is ultimately what [Problem] demands.
Worked Example — Body Paragraph 2

Turning to the question of laws and fines, it is widely acknowledged that financial penalties provide an immediate deterrent for corporate polluters. While education is a slow process, legislation can effect change almost overnight. Furthermore, the implications of strict regulation cannot be overlooked, as they hold large-scale industries accountable for their carbon footprint in a way that voluntary education simply cannot.

Paragraph 4 — Conclusion
Step Option A — Direct approach Option B — Analytical approach
1 · Summary In light of the above, it would seem that while both [A] and [B] are valuable, they serve different timeframes. All things considered, both approaches have their respective merits in tackling [Topic].
2 · The Choice On balance, it is my firm conviction that [Point X] is the more influential factor. When comparing the two, the evidence suggests that [Point X] is the more fundamental of the two.
3 · Justification While [Point Y] is vital for the future, the urgency of the situation necessitates the immediate, enforceable impact that only [Point X] can provide. Ultimately, without the foundation provided by [Point X], any attempts at [Point Y] are likely to prove futile.
1
Summary
Acknowledge that both points have value without abandoning your final position.
Having examined both [Point 1] and [Point 2], it is clear that each has a distinct and valuable role to play.
While neither approach is without its limitations, both make a meaningful contribution to [Goal].
2
The Choice
State clearly which point you believe is more effective or important.
Nevertheless, on balance, [Point X] emerges as the more compelling and immediately effective approach.
Weighing the evidence, I would contend that [Point X] is ultimately the stronger of the two solutions.
3
Justification
Explain your final choice in one sentence. This is the most important sentence in the essay at C1 level.
Without [Point X], the benefits of [Point Y] are unlikely to reach their full potential.
The urgency of the current situation demands [Point X] — a measure that [Point Y], for all its merits, is simply unable to provide.
Worked Example — Conclusion

In light of the above, it would seem that while both education and legislation are valuable, they serve different timeframes. On balance, it is my firm conviction that laws and fines are the more influential factor. While education is vital for the future, the urgency of the climate crisis necessitates the immediate, enforceable impact that only legal frameworks can provide.

Full Phrase Reference Table — Task 1
Step Option A — Direct approach Option B — Analytical approach
Introduction
Hook It is often asserted that [Topic] is the most pressing challenge of our era. In recent years, [Topic] has become a matter of intense public debate.
Outline This essay will examine two possible strategies: [Point 1] and [Point 2]. This essay will evaluate the merits of both [Point 1] and [Point 2].
Roadmap …before determining which approach is more effective. …with a view to deciding which is the more fundamental factor.
Body Paragraph 1
Opening Primary consideration must be given to the role of [Point 1]. To begin with, it is widely argued that [Point 1] is a key driver of change.
Reasoning A compelling argument in favour of this method is that it fosters a long-term shift in mindset. From a [social/pedagogical/economic] standpoint, this approach addresses the root cause.
Result This in turn leads to a situation where [Result] becomes second nature to the citizenry. Consequently, this ensures that [X] is viewed as a core value rather than a chore.
Body Paragraph 2
Transition Turning to the question of [Point 2], it is widely acknowledged that [key claim]. On the other hand, the role of [Point 2] cannot be overlooked.
Contrast While [Point 1] is a slow process, [Point 2] can effect change almost overnight. Unlike the voluntary nature of [Point 1], [Point 2] provides an immediate deterrent.
Big Picture Furthermore, the implications of [Point 2] cannot be overlooked, as they hold [Group] accountable. This strategy provides a necessary framework that [Point 1] simply cannot offer.
Conclusion
Summary In light of the above, it would seem that while both [A] and [B] are valuable, they serve different timeframes. All things considered, both approaches have their respective merits in tackling [Topic].
The Choice On balance, it is my firm conviction that [Point X] is the more influential factor. When comparing the two, the evidence suggests that [Point X] is the more fundamental.
Justification While [Point Y] is vital for the future, the urgency of the situation necessitates the immediate impact that only [Point X] can provide. Ultimately, without the foundation provided by [Point X], any attempts at [Point Y] are likely to prove futile.

Key Vocabulary & Phrases — Task 1 Essay

Key phrases
primary consideration must be given to a compelling argument in favour of this in turn leads to turning to the question of the implications of this cannot be overlooked in light of the above on balance, it is my firm conviction that ultimately the success of [topic] hinges upon
Sophisticated collocations
effects change almost overnight fosters a long-term shift in mindset holds [group] accountable addresses the root cause a necessary framework at a systemic level
Opinion & evaluation
it is my firm conviction that the evidence suggests that I would contend that on balance weighing the evidence
Linking words
furthermore while in stark contrast to turning to in light of consequently ultimately
Formal Letter. Written to people in authority — managers, coordinators, editors, councils. Register must be consistently formal. No contractions. Precise, professional language throughout. Common purposes: complaint, concern, application, suggestions for improvement. 220–260 words.
Salutation Opening Problem / Issue Suggestion / Proposal Call to Action Close
Salutation
Use the correct title and name. If the name is unknown, use Dear Sir or Madam — then close with Yours faithfully.
Dear Mr. / Ms. [Surname],  (close: Yours sincerely)
Dear Sir or Madam,  (close: Yours faithfully)
Dear [Title — e.g. Internship Coordinator / Editor / Manager],
Opening — State Your Purpose
The opening sentence must state clearly why you are writing. Formal, precise, direct.
I am writing to express my profound dissatisfaction with [issue] at [organisation/programme].
I am writing with regard to [matter], which I believe requires your urgent attention.
I am writing to formally raise concerns about [issue] and to suggest how it might be addressed.
I am writing in response to [advertisement/article/programme], having recently [action].
I am writing to express my firm conviction that [position], and to request that [action].
Having been drawn to [organisation's] reputation for [quality], I applied with the firm conviction that [expectation].
Body Paragraph 1 — The Problem
Describe the issue clearly and factually. Acknowledge the gap between what was promised and what was delivered.
Regrettably, the reality of [situation] fell far short of the expectations set out in [document/advertisement/programme].
While [positive aspect] was highlighted, I found that [problem] in practice.
From a [professional/educational] standpoint, [issue] offered very little value.
[Person/system] was consistently unavailable, leaving me to [struggle/manage] with virtually no guidance.
I found that [negative experience], which was both [frustrating/disappointing] and, I believe, avoidable.
Body Paragraph 2 — The Suggestion
Propose a concrete improvement. Use formal suggestion language — not commands.
It is my belief that the [programme/system] would benefit significantly from [improvement].
I would strongly suggest implementing [specific measure] to ensure that [positive outcome].
Unless these issues are addressed, [negative consequence] — a situation which I am sure you would wish to avoid.
A more structured approach to [area] would go a long way towards ensuring [outcome].
I would recommend introducing [measure] as a means of [improvement].
Call to Action & Close
I trust that you will give this matter your urgent consideration.
I look forward to hearing your thoughts on how these improvements might be implemented.
I would be grateful if you could respond to this letter at your earliest convenience.
I hope that future candidates will not share my sense of frustration.
Yours sincerely, [name]  /  Yours faithfully, [name]
Worked Example — Internship Complaint Letter

Dear Mr. Henderson,

I am writing to express my profound dissatisfaction with the internship programme I completed at "Global Reach Marketing" last month. Having been drawn to the firm's reputation for excellence, I applied with the firm conviction that the experience would provide a solid foundation for my future career.

Regrettably, the reality of the placement fell far short of the expectations set out in your promotional material. While the advertisement highlighted "one-on-one mentorship," I found that senior staff were consistently unavailable, leaving me to navigate complex software with virtually no guidance. Furthermore, my workload consisted almost exclusively of administrative tasks which, from a professional development standpoint, offered very little value.

It is my belief that the programme would benefit significantly from a more structured approach. I would strongly suggest implementing a weekly feedback session between interns and their supervisors to ensure that the learning objectives are being met. Unless these issues are addressed, the firm risks gaining a reputation for underutilising ambitious talent.

I trust that you will give this matter your urgent consideration, as I would hate for future students to share my sense of frustration. I look forward to hearing your thoughts on how these improvements might be implemented.

Yours sincerely,
Kemal

Key Phrases — Formal Letter

Opening
I am writing to express my profound dissatisfaction with I am writing with regard to the firm conviction that
The problem
fell far short of the expectations set out in was consistently unavailable from a [professional/educational] standpoint offered very little value
Making suggestions
it is my belief that I would strongly suggest [verb+ing] unless these issues are addressed
Closing
I trust that you will give this matter your urgent consideration I look forward to hearing your thoughts on Yours sincerely (name known) Yours faithfully (name unknown)